System of assessment of students at the university
Generally in most degree organizations around the globe, they use a four-point system for evaluating students’ knowledge, abilities and abilities: “excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory”.
Understanding the meaning of points
The assessment “excellent” deserves a student who may have found comprehensive, systematic and deep knowledge, the capacity to independently perform the tasks given by this program, knowledgeable about the main and extra literary works, suggested by this system. Such an evaluation additionally involves the mastering of this relationship amongst the fundamental principles of control and their importance when it comes to acquired profession.
The evaluation “good” sets the student that has learned the academic and program material in complete, successfully fulfills this program’s tasks, worked out of the main literature recommended by this program. This is certainly, students who’s got shown the systematic nature of discipline knowledge and is with the capacity of self-replenishment and updating along the way of further educational work and activity that is professional.
The grades “satisfactory” deserve students that has found the data for the fundamental material that is educational the extent required for further training and future operate in an occupation, effective at doing the tasks given to because of the system, familiar with the main literature suggested by this system. As being a guideline, this assessment is presented to pupils who have made flaws in the response to the exam as well as in the performance for the exam assignments, but have actually demonstrated the capability to eradicate them.
The assessment is “unsatisfactory” for the pupil who’s understanding of gaps which have resulted in fundamental mistakes within the utilization of the customwritings tasks provided for by the system, that is, a student that is struggling to carry on education or start professional tasks after graduation without extra training in the appropriate discipline.
Shortcomings of four-point assessment rating and system system
A system that is four-way assessing pupils’ knowledge, abilities and abilities requires significant improvement or replacement. Its primary drawbacks are: inadequate inspiration for the persistence of educational and cognitive activity, as it centers on acquiring a minimum of knowledge (“made up” – “did perhaps not make up”); made for the reproduction of knowledge and thinking (in sessional conditions, quickly accumulated information quickly “weathered”); subjectivity into the assessment of pupil’s knowledge; inconsistency using the college system, which pupils used as previous students, etc.
The rating system of evaluation, which is based on the accumulation of grades for a certain period of study (module, semester, year, whole term of training) for a comprehensive educational and cognitive activity, is becoming increasingly popular along with the four-point traditional system of evaluation of students’ knowledge. The sum of the these assessments serves as an indicator that is quantitative of quality of educational and cognitive activity of this student when compared with the successes of his fellow students.
The rating system for evaluating students’ knowledge, skills and abilities is founded on the following principles:
- each academic control and the pupil’s work with its mastering is examined into the credit devices, the total amount of which can be dependant on the rating;
- the record associated with pupil’s present work must certanly be held, that will be reflected into the final evaluation (in the units of credits);
- the peculiarities of teaching various topics (complexity, need for discipline within the curriculum) are taken into account, this is certainly, the complexity element (importance);
- option of various kinds of control (outgoing, current, intermediate, last);
The student rating for a semester or year is understood to be the arithmetic that is average of rating for every discipline.
To implement a rating system for evaluating students’ knowledge, certain conditions are important: the readiness of teachers and students to perceive them; appropriate organizational and support that is methodological in particular, separate work of pupils is obligatory; introduction of modular training; work accounting in the shape of unique tables; application of written verification of real information, etc.